A Community Website by Lopez Island
Started by John Waugh
Oct 7, 2023
Agree
12
Clarification of Hospital Levy Lid Lift Vote
Oct 7, 2023
First, let me be clear that this note is neither an endorsement nor a criticism of the Lopez Island Hospital District's (LIHD) proposed tax levy lid lift to be voted on this November.

Rather, it is meant to clarify what I believe is a difficult point to understand, in the language surrounding the proposal. I take no opinion here as to the approval or disapproval of the measure itself.

The following statement has been made, with slight variations, in Lopez Rocks, Islands Weekly, LIHD's Health Matters newsletter, and other places:
"When the Hospital District was created, voters approved a levy rate of $.75 per $1,000.00 of assessed property valuation. Since then, although property values have risen, a 2001 state law limits tax revenue increases to just 1% above the prior year. Thus, the levy rate available to the District has dropped to $.48 per $1,000.00 valuation." The LIHD titles this paragraph as, "Why is LIHD asking voters to restore the regular property tax level..."

This seems to imply the "regular" tax level is the initial $.75 per $1000, but "regular" in this case is meaningless, and therefore misleading.

In 2018, when Lopez Island was assessed at $1,111,549,689, the $.75 per $1000 meant $833,662 went to the LIHD for their associated costs. Now, the levy rate is $.48, BECAUSE Lopez is currently assessed higher. BUT the LIHD STILL gets its $833,662 per year (increased by the 1% per year mentioned above). The levy AMOUNT in dollars stays the same even though the levy PERCENT is lower (due to the increase in Lopez Island's property assessment). They still get their full piece of pie, even though the pie is bigger.

So it is not meaningful to ask voters to "restore the regular property tax level," as LIHD is STILL getting the "regular" property tax level in DOLLARS (+1%/year). There is no "regular" tax percentage level. If the .75 per 1000 tax RATE is to be used as "regular" today, this results in levy dollars of $1,243,719 going to LIHD every year (+1% each year) for the next 6 years (based on 2022 assessment figures for Lopez).

Current-year $$ going to LIHD are approximately $833,662, plus those 1%/year increases, and this WILL continue even if the lid lift doesn't pass. New $$ if the levy lid lift passes equal approximately $1,243,719 each year for the next 6 years.

Another way of saying this is, LIHD feels they need an additional $400,000 per year to pay for the factors they list in the news letter. To me, this gives better data with which to evaluate the levy lid lift request, in dollars rather than percentages.

Hope this gives a clearer picture of what LIHD is asking, and helps in voter decision-making. Please, folks, if I've made any errors my logic, let me know!
Comment by John Waugh
Oct 14, 2023
Agree
0
Transparency. That's all I'm asking for.

Here is a simplified example that may clarify what my issue is. Dollars are wildly reduced, and approximations used, but the principles are the same.

In 2017, the new LIHD commissioners think, "Hmmm, we need money to get this thing off the ground. Let's ask for up to one dollar. That should do it."

At that time, Lopez Island's assessed value is $100 (bear with me). So the dollar asked for represents 1% of that (1/100 = 1%). LIHD thinks, "Y'know, we better take the whole amount while we can," so they tell San Juan County about that. SJC sets the levy rate at 1% so the LIHD can get that $1.

Now, in 2023, Lopez Island is worth $200--property is booming. LIHD has been getting their levy $1 each year, plus a little from the state-allowed increase cap. But prices of everything have risen, and LIHD thinks, "Hmm, we need a lot more money now. Let's ask voters to lift the levy."

Do they ask for $1.25? $1.50? Maybe they figure, with hard times, voters aren't going to like these numbers. They see that their current $1 per year, started in 2017, NOW represents just 0.5% (half a percent) of the current Lopez value of $200. So they think, "How about this? We say, were only getting half the percentage we were in 2017. Let's ask the voters to restore the REGULAR rate of 1%. That sound's reasonable!"

But the fact is, the 1% was just a FUDGE FACTOR SJC used to get the the original $1, based on the 2017 assessed value. There is nothing *regular* about it. The "regular" value was the $1.

So they ask the voters, "Just restore our regular tax rate of 1%..." BUT 1% of the 2023 Lopez assessment of $200 is $2. So the LIHD is really asking for $2, which is a raise of 100% from 2017! Asking the voters to DOUBLE the levy dollar AMOUNT while calling it "regular."

Back to reality, the figures change, but the principles are the same. The state requires levy amounts to be stated in terms of so many dollars per $1000 of assessed value, but at any given time, this can be translated into straight percents as I have done above.

The 2017 rate of $.74 per $1000 is "like" the 1% above. The current levy rate of $.48 is "like" the 0.5% above, but would be different because I just made up the Lopez valuations, to simplify things. But the principle is the same. LIHD is requesting voters to restore the "regular" rate of $.74...but as noted above, that was a FUDGE FACTOR generated by SJC to get the correct dollar amount AT THAT TIME based on Lopez's valuation.

As in my example, using that TEMPORARY rate as the current rate leads to a rather massive increase in dollars. The original $.74/1000 generated $833,662 per year for the LIHD. Applying that *fudge factor* NOW would mean $1,243,719 for the LIHD. So not double as in my example, but still a more than 50% increase from 2017. Figures are approximate, and don't account for the minimal yearly increases.

Of course costs have gone up, and it is reasonable to ask the voters for more money. Perhaps a lot more. But in my mind, the language calling the FUDGE FACTOR the "regular" rate is misleading, and doesn't properly represent the $1,243,719 per year they are actually asking for--$400,000 more than the current levy (approximately). The proposition in the Voter Pamphlet is even titled "Restoring Regular Tax Levy." I hope I have made my case here that the term "regular" is at best fanciful in this context.

LIHD is also asking for an annual increase of 6% per year, substantially more than the current inflation rate of 3.7% over the past year, and than the Federal Reserve's target of 2%.

Knowing the dollars of the ask, and not just the percentages, if you feel the request is needed to provide an efficient, responsible, friendly, and locally accountable clinic, then vote "yes." Otherwise vote "no." It's as simple as that.
Comment by Steve Snowden
Oct 13, 2023
Agree
1
OK, Dan, I'll bite. It never occurred to me that the Open Space designation on our pasture was at all relevant to my support for our hospital district. First, Open Space designations on parcels are public records freely and easily accessible through the County's Polaris website. Second, the Open Space designation reduces our taxable assessment b ... Read All
Comment by Dan Post
Oct 12, 2023
Agree
2
Steve, I think that anyone who supports the Levy Lid Lift should have full disclosure and say if they get a property tax break. Do you agree?
Comment by Dan Post
Oct 12, 2023
Agree
1
John, correct that we did not vote on the tax levy amount. The Hospital District was voted on and passed and then the HD board members set the amount. So your statement about us voting on the $.75 is not correct.
Comment by Rob Thesman
Oct 12, 2023
Agree
1
John, my recollection was that we voted on a levy rate of *up to 75¢ per 000*, and that we were being told leading up to the election that they would start collecting the tax at a lower levy rate. Then, shortly *after* the election the new commissioners decided to take the whole 75¢. As documented ... Read All
Comment by John Waugh
Oct 12, 2023
Agree
0
Hi Dan.

go to
http:/ ... Read All
Comment by Steve Snowden
Oct 12, 2023
Agree
1
While I support the levy lid increase, I'm concerned that the levy lid increase is based on 2023 tax year assessments, where it will start to be applied on the 2024 tax year assessments. It is likely that countywide assessments will go up 15% to 20% on average for 2024. This difference isn't as bad as the road levy lid increase of last year but s ... Read All
Comment by Dan Post
Oct 11, 2023
Agree
2
John Waugh, in your posting you say, "When the Hospital District was created, voters approved a levy rate of $.75 per $1,000.00 of assessed property valuation". As I recall (I could be wrong) the voters did not vote to approve a levy rate of $.75 per thousand. If you read the comments of the Hospital District you will see that they are very caref ... Read All
Comment by Lopez Island Hospital District
Oct 9, 2023
Agree
1
The Lopez Island Hospital District Commissioners would like to thank Mr. Waugh for his thoughtful comments on Lopez Rocks. We agree the wording needs to be clarified. What the Hospital District is asking is for the originally approved property tax rate to be restored. He is perfectly correct that taxes received have been stable plus the 1% a year. This ... Read All
Comment by Robert Buchholz
Oct 9, 2023
Agree
1
While your math is correct, it does leave out an important factor. While levy increases have been limited to 1% since the initial levy passage in 2017, healthcare costs have had no such limit.

The levy rate increase proposed is from $0.48 per $1000 valuation to $0.75 per $1000 or a 56% increase. Over ... Read All
Comment by Diane Dear (T&D Farms)
Oct 8, 2023
Agree
1
Hi John, We think you have this exactly correct. Thank you so much for taking the time to write and post this! Todd Goldsmith and Diane Dear